
Rich Paul wants to clear something up. Loudly.
The Klutch Sports boss says reports claiming he demanded the Mavericks trade Anthony Davis are flat-out wrong. In his words, that narrative is “fake news,” born from aggregation, telephone games, and internet echo chambers.
Paul said the reality is far simpler. If a player is happy where he is, great. If a player is settled, comfortable, and in a good situation, there is no incentive to force movement just for the sake of headlines.
“This idea I don’t want a player somewhere, that’s not true,” Paul said on the Game Over podcast.
His focus, he explained, is not on forcing trades but on people. Family. Stability. Well-being. And, yes, money. Paul joked that he does not care where the paycheck comes from, as long as his client is positioned to get paid and taken care of.
The larger message is clear. Davis’ situation in Dallas is not being driven by agent pressure, despite outside speculation. Paul is pushing back on the idea that he is pulling strings behind the scenes or steering Davis toward an exit.
Trade rumors will continue. They always do. Especially with a player of Davis’ stature. But Paul’s stance is simple — this is not a power play, not a demand, and not a behind-the-scenes campaign.
Sometimes the internet runs faster than the truth. Paul is saying this is one of those times.
Looking for the latest NBA Insider News & Rumors?
Be sure to follow Hoops Wire on TWITTER and FACEBOOK for breaking NBA News and Rumors for all 30 teams!







We have…. “This idea I don’t want a player somewhere, that’s not true,” Paul said
and
“If a player is happy where he is, great. If a player is settled, comfortable, and in a good situation, there is no incentive to force movement just for the sake of headlines.”
I guess these statements do not apply to other agents’ players. Only his own.
He wanted Austin Reeves not in LA. And he raised that idea to generate clicks for his podcast, modern day equivalent of headlines. At least that’s the current claim they were using to deflect the conflicts of interest questions for his Reeves statements.
So given that lying isn’t a problem Is this more don’t believe what your eyes just told you? Or is he telling the truth this time? He’ll cry wolf for real at some point But will anybody believe him?